A Scientific journal would, no doubt, forbid any publishing by a respected creationist...since he cannot be a scientist and a creationist simultaneously.
Any evidence to support that scientific journals have allowed such publication?
ID proponents have had to fight through the same.
There is no such ban by any journal, AFAIK. However, any creationist who wanted to be published would have to bring scientific evidence to the table. That's something that creationists have simply not been able to do. ID-ers are in the same boat. They have something they call a "theory," but it is really nothing more than a thought experiment, supported by no scientific evidence.