No. I was simply quoting a portion of the article by the writer that commenced this thread.
Did I say it is what I felt or thought? No. But one national writer thinks it is so.
The question is, is it accurate or not?
Many Darwinians think creationists are ignorant. This is probably because we're so used to hearing gross distortions, fallacies, and outright falsehoods about evolution from its opponents; and because, from the standpoint of science, there is no valid case against evolution. I'm not saying I don't resort to ad hominems myself; I do, mostly out of frustration. But there is a distinction between attacking the person and critiquing the idea, and it would be better if we all did the latter.
In any case, I'm going to be really busy for a few days, so I'm winding this up here.