Posted on 08/07/2005 10:09:16 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
COLORADO SPRINGS -- The U.S. military has devised its first-ever war plans for guarding against and responding to terrorist attacks in the United States, envisioning 15 potential crisis scenarios and anticipating several simultaneous strikes around the country, according to officers who drafted the plans.
The classified plans, developed here at Northern Command headquarters, outline a variety of possible roles for quick-reaction forces estimated at as many as 3,000 ground troops per attack, a number that could easily grow depending on the extent of the damage and the abilities of civilian response teams.
The possible scenarios range from "low end," relatively modest crowd-control missions to "high-end," full-scale disaster management after catastrophic attacks such as the release of a deadly biological agent or the explosion of a radiological device, several officers said.
Some of the worst-case scenarios involve three attacks at the same time, in keeping with a Pentagon directive earlier this year ordering Northcom, as the command is called, to plan for multiple simultaneous attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
My friend, Americans are not a timid people. Nor are we cowards.
It really depends on one's heritage.
Mine: no problem. We are a free society that respects human rights and honors personal freedoms. Our population of legal citizens are not living in fear and mortal dread of their government.
I remember the atrocities that Japan committed to the innocent non-combattants of Nan King. That and numerous similar horrors probably are no longer in Japanese history books. But stop.
What do you think? Let's guess.
No different than "War Plan White" which the U.S. military had in effect for almost 40 years and practiced on a yearly basis. "War Plan White" was part of the famous "Color War Plans" that existed from around 1900 until just after WWII. "War Plan White" was known as the "U.S. Domestic Contingency".
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
I appreciate the info.
Perhaps he is "intelligent enough" to see through the false dilemma you pose. Any more fallacies you want to prop up?
Maybe Bush should repeat/restate his famous line...
"You're either with us, or you're against us".....and maybe he should also add...
"If you're against us, and we get attacked on US soil again, you better be 'ready' for those 70 virgins, cause we'll be sending you to your reward ASAP. And no, we won't stop at destroying just your 'mosques'"
Scary stuff.
Yep.
bump
What would you do if you were sitting on your porch in Kentucky, videotaping the kids playing in the yard, and just happenned to get crystal clear video of the missle shooting down the plane?
My initial good citizen reaction would be to give the video to the "authorities". My paranoid tin foil hat wearing X-Files self says to me that I would sit on the video, and wait for the statements to come out to see what happens. If my video proved different from the official story, before I released it, I would buy a lot of life insurance.
Porbably no different, and probably kinder and gentler martial law, too. But this is the age of the Internet, when the what and who of such planning cannot be kept from the people.
Correct Fen:
Martial law is a concompetant requirement of homeland military action as most informed people are aware. Otherwise our military have no legal role on home soil.
Since this creep is so insincere a straight reply would be a waste of time.
He's is obviously on a mission to discredit our President and our government. So why not remind him of his sullied heritage?
Our government does a pretty god job of discrediting itself. It will no doubt perform incompetently if there is a mass-casualty event.
Or do you trust the kind of people you find at TSA checkpoints to keep you and your family safe?
Speculation about how "our government" will do in the face of "mass disaster" is unnecessary.
Remember 9/11? Hundreds of NYFD men and women selflessly gave their own lives when duty called. Sad and tragic as it is (I include them and their families in my prayers..as I am certain many Americans do).
The outbreak of war hostilities in our homeland will hardly compare to the occasional "goosing' your Grandma gets at the JAL check-in counter. Pal.
This is America.
Only to those that have misplaced trust. Yes, this is America, where public sector employees are notoriously lazy and stupid, though, to their credit (I suppose) they are somewhat less corrupt than in Mexico or Nigeria.
Sir, you initiated this exchange on a fulcrum of skepticism and distrust...in our goivernment and in public sector employees. Your mantra had the familiar left wing faux-alarmist "stuff" we've all heard before.
The term "sedition" includes this type of conduct for obvious reasons.
This forum welcomes all points of view. And we steadfastly agree to disagree with those who have no faith in our loyalty and our determination to our defend freedom and way of life.
They can't spell that one nuther.
Your replies indicate an odd disinvolvement from the whole prospect of civil unrest in the event of martal law being declared. I get the impression that you think that you would continue to observe and disapprove of civil servants like you currently do (and perhaps always have.) Ain't going to be like that Pal. When War comes to your nieghborhood you will have lots of other things to do.
Your status as an observer will change to active participant.
PS: This has been fun and I must move on. Thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.