I think that might be the Nietzschean view; redgolum's tag line suggests that possibly he might elucidate that point.But that is not what I believe, nor what I meant. The Bible will tell you not to be arrogant; "Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall." If you and I dispute an issue, and you insist a priori that you are objective, and that all further discussion must take that as a starting point, you are arrogant. You are in fact a Sophist - a claimer of wisdom.
If I take a philosophical view ("philo" = brotherly love + "sophy" = of wisdom), I claim only that I love wisdom - and will listen to reason - rather than that I am wise - and have no need to trouble myself listening to your arguments. To take the philosophical view does not deny the existence of wisdom (far from it) but it does rule out arguing from a claim of wisdom.
Of course for the philosophical view to admit the existence of wisdom, it must allow and insist on there being a conclusion to argument; if the sophist cannot win with a reasonable standard of proof he is likely to demand an ever higher standard of proof rather than to admit defeat.