No, not so. I found the leaflet to be a significant piece of direct evidence. I asked honest questions about the on-the-ground context and impact of the leaflets. This is not bad-faith or setting aside the evidence. It is a quest for more evidence, resulting in a deeper and broader understanding.
You think I have irrevocably pre-judged the matter. No, I am still examining evidence. If you have anything to offer along these lines, I would be interested in seeing it.
Post #77 clearly stated (pre-judged?) that the bombings were indiscriminate. Has anything that's been presented since post #77 (along with post #65) changed that opinion? Also, I have no further material to offer; I'm satisfied with what's been presented.