Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ksen
I don't think I need to elaborate.

No? I asked a specific starter question.

In the Bible God describes a distinctly NON-evolutionary method of Creation.

Yes. The question is whether this was intended as a history lesson or as something else.

If He used evolution then He wouldn't have made up some fairy tale to describe what He did.

That is your thesis. I am asking you to elaborate on it and reflect on the audience for the work and whether the story was indeed intended to be a scientifically accurate historical record.

SD

70 posted on 08/04/2005 12:35:04 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
Yes. The question is whether this was intended as a history lesson or as something else.

It was intended to be both. The New Testament says that the Old Testament accounts are there for our examples. So the Old Testament is history with a point. But just because the history recorded in the Old Testament is used to give us instruction doesn't lessen its historical truthfulness.

That is your thesis. I am asking you to elaborate on it and reflect on the audience for the work and whether the story was indeed intended to be a scientifically accurate historical record.

I think the account was meant to be an accurate representation of what happened in the first seven days of the universe.

In Exodus 20 God even emphasizes that the seven days of Creation are seven literal, 24-hour days (Ex 20:8-11).

76 posted on 08/04/2005 12:45:12 PM PDT by ksen ("He that knows nothing will believe anything." - Thomas Fuller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson