To: wallcrawlr
I usually like Krauthammer, but he's out of his element here.
6 posted on
08/01/2005 11:03:49 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkes.)
To: trisham
I usually like Krauthammer, but he's out of his element here. You do know that Krauthammer is an MD don't you?
I think he's right in his element. A well spoken conservative that knows his science.
13 posted on
08/01/2005 11:11:33 AM PDT by
narby
(There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
To: trisham
I usually like Krauthammer, but he's out of his element here. Actually, he's not. He has an M.D. from Harvard. It doesn't make him right, though.
He hits the nail on the head, however, about how evolution is seen as part of a general, and undeniable, assault on religion.
Further, it wasn't until after the turn of the 20th Century when scientific authorities changed their template for the worse from "how did God do it" to "if God did it."
27 posted on
08/01/2005 11:22:03 AM PDT by
Tribune7
To: trisham
"I usually like Krauthammer, but he's out of his element here."
The guy is a propagandist ideologue of the worst kind. Never to be trusted.
726 posted on
08/01/2005 10:26:05 PM PDT by
TAquinas
(Demographics has consequences)
To: trisham
This is a brilliant description of the facts. If faith is a light, that light can get us through a lot of dark places, however, that light when stared at too long, like the headlights of an oncoming tractor trailer, can blind us and render us paralyzed and and over run. Science is fact. Who decides whose religious creation story is accurate? How do you weigh it and measure it? If more of another religion prevail, does that make their definition fact?
802 posted on
08/02/2005 4:33:30 AM PDT by
mict42
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson