Of course I said all that how am I lying? I am not sure you understand the definition of a lie. As you can see I said that if the religious right acts in such and such a manner they will be acting like an American Taliban. That is a simple statement. If Republicans must pass a religious litmus test then we are no different than the Muslims we are fighting. Now calling me a liar for standing up for what i said is sort of silly.
"Of course I said all that how am I lying? I am not sure you understand the definition of a lie. As you can see I said that if the religious right acts in such and such a manner they will be acting like an American Taliban. That is a simple statement. If Republicans must pass a religious litmus test then we are no different than the Muslims we are fighting."
Let me post it again. Your trolling ways are so evident now, Im happy that I and a few others here have exposed you. ZOT sentis!!!
Please read your words below again, unless of course that is too difficult for you? Since I know it is so difficult, please pay special attention to the part where you suggest "Oh there wont be burkas but there will be Blue Laws, forced religious instruction, a limitation of the first amendment,"
You're lying. You equated the christians with the taliban:
"Republicans are on the verge of absolute control of this country but the Religious right could ruin it all by acting like the American Taliban at this juncture."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1453719/posts?page=122#122
Just to solidify the point, here you actually admit what you think the "American Taliban" as you call them would do:
"Oh there wont be burkas but there will be Blue Laws, forced religious instruction, a limitation of the first amendment, Religion as state law. Those all happened here in the past and those are the things we are fighting against in the Islamic nations."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1453719/posts?page=122#122
Sentis, I'm a right-wing, conservative extremist to use the words of the MSM. I'm not religious. In fact, I'm a non- practicing Cathoilic who was raised in N.Y. I would like to understand your claim that the Republicans can't win unless the Religious Right shuts up and stops using a LItmus test.
My theory is that the Republicans can't win without them. Until the Moral Majority got involved, the Dems considered the Congress their domain, and they were right. Without religious conservatives, we wouldn't hold the house or senate. The White House tends to flip often.
Bringing in apethetic independents by being dem lite will not, imo, win the Republicans seats consistently. Those people don't care enough to even know which party they belong in.
Ignoring the religious conservatives, who are the backbone of the party, will hasten the demise of the Republican party. Maybe where you are, being a Rockefeller Republlican is o.k., but in the south and Midwest it isn't enough. Principals are not something people toss aside just to win a campaign. What you get then is an incumbent who doesn't share your core values. Might as well vote dem, if that's what you want.
Winning for the sake of winning, will not bring the change religious conservatives want. For the RINO to throw them a couple of bones will not hurt the RINO. Shunning Christian Conservatives from the table absolutely will. Oh, and Primaries are the time to find the most acceptable candidate to the voter. In the general, it's time to vote for the lesser of two evils. So, yes now is the time for Christion conservatives to voice their opinions. This voicing also let's the candidates know what positions they must be willing to take if they want those votes.