Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: protest1
Yes, but it wasn't the O-ring composition but rather the putty used to seal them that had "big bad asbestos" removed from its formulation. Another post among the dozens about the foam composition brought up the fact that once asbestos was removed from the putty, it was way less heat resistant. It is believed to be the factor behind a few rocket failures and not just the Challenger. Search on "asbestos" and "putty" and you will probably find it.
46 posted on 07/28/2005 9:26:42 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Iraq is the bug light for terrorists" (Mike McConnell 7/2/05))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

With Challenger a number of issues snowballed to make that o-ring fail. The real mistake was in NASA's inability to see those factors were snowballing. The data was there.


66 posted on 07/28/2005 9:44:26 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded; protest1
See this WND link for more on the putty.
83 posted on 07/28/2005 10:15:13 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded

Thanks for the information.


106 posted on 07/28/2005 2:44:14 PM PDT by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson