To: InvisibleChurch
This might seem like a dumb suggestion but why not use a giant carbon fiber hairnet over the whole ET? I mean, the original thinking was "it's just foam" and that any damage by a strike would be minimal. Didn't we learn that many at NASA were aghast when they did the post Columbia testing, firing that foam block at a mockup, and realized what level of damage could result? Going back to a CFC-based foam is a no-brainer but there was still some foam loss even with the old stuff.
For that matter, why not reverse the roll maneuver and get gravity pulling debris away from the shuttle instead of putting the shuttle between the ET and the earth? These are simple questions and there are probably of ways to shoot them down but sometimes the simple answers are the hardest to find.
31 posted on
07/28/2005 9:21:05 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Iraq is the bug light for terrorists" (Mike McConnell 7/2/05))
To: NonValueAdded
The hair net idea sounds like a good one actually. That would at least catch the big chunks like the one that hit the Columbia.
42 posted on
07/28/2005 9:25:04 AM PDT by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: NonValueAdded
The gravity vector component is minuscule. In civilian talk, it wouldn't make a measurable difference.
50 posted on
07/28/2005 9:28:00 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: NonValueAdded
For that matter, why not reverse the roll maneuver and get gravity pulling debris away from the shuttle instead of putting the shuttle between the ET and the earth? Negative Gs.
To: NonValueAdded
How much extra weight would a cover to prevent foam from shedding off the ET add to launch weight? This mass would have to be subtracted from payload.
Can anyone present empirical proof that freon causes global warming, or did a discredited theory murder the crew of Columbia?
56 posted on
07/28/2005 9:35:23 AM PDT by
jonascord
(What is better than the wind at 6 O'clock on the 600 yard line?)
To: NonValueAdded
For that matter, why not reverse the roll maneuver and get gravity pulling debris away from the shuttle instead of putting the shuttle between the ET and the earth? These are simple questions and there are probably of ways to shoot them down but sometimes the simple answers are the hardest to find.What a great idea...wonder how much payload weight they would lose if they did that. Thinking out loud; what if they launched with the orbiter on top until the air thined out and then they rolled over?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson