Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InvisibleChurch
This might seem like a dumb suggestion but why not use a giant carbon fiber hairnet over the whole ET? I mean, the original thinking was "it's just foam" and that any damage by a strike would be minimal. Didn't we learn that many at NASA were aghast when they did the post Columbia testing, firing that foam block at a mockup, and realized what level of damage could result? Going back to a CFC-based foam is a no-brainer but there was still some foam loss even with the old stuff.

For that matter, why not reverse the roll maneuver and get gravity pulling debris away from the shuttle instead of putting the shuttle between the ET and the earth? These are simple questions and there are probably of ways to shoot them down but sometimes the simple answers are the hardest to find.

31 posted on 07/28/2005 9:21:05 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Iraq is the bug light for terrorists" (Mike McConnell 7/2/05))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

The hair net idea sounds like a good one actually. That would at least catch the big chunks like the one that hit the Columbia.


42 posted on 07/28/2005 9:25:04 AM PDT by tfecw (Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded

The gravity vector component is minuscule. In civilian talk, it wouldn't make a measurable difference.


50 posted on 07/28/2005 9:28:00 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded
For that matter, why not reverse the roll maneuver and get gravity pulling debris away from the shuttle instead of putting the shuttle between the ET and the earth?

Negative Gs.

51 posted on 07/28/2005 9:28:19 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded
How much extra weight would a cover to prevent foam from shedding off the ET add to launch weight? This mass would have to be subtracted from payload.

Can anyone present empirical proof that freon causes global warming, or did a discredited theory murder the crew of Columbia?

56 posted on 07/28/2005 9:35:23 AM PDT by jonascord (What is better than the wind at 6 O'clock on the 600 yard line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded
For that matter, why not reverse the roll maneuver and get gravity pulling debris away from the shuttle instead of putting the shuttle between the ET and the earth? These are simple questions and there are probably of ways to shoot them down but sometimes the simple answers are the hardest to find.

What a great idea...wonder how much payload weight they would lose if they did that. Thinking out loud; what if they launched with the orbiter on top until the air thined out and then they rolled over?

117 posted on 07/29/2005 5:21:05 AM PDT by fedupjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson