Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyborg
Well to be fair if I saw a picture like that, I'd wonder myself.

Granted, I haven't seen the photo, so I really shouldn't be drawing any conclusions. I suppose it could really depend on the perspective from which the picture was taken. Assuming it was an innocuous act, an inexpensive digital camera would've saved them a lot of hassle.
40 posted on 07/27/2005 4:55:52 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: andyk
Granted, I haven't seen the photo, so I really shouldn't be drawing any conclusions

And if you did see the photo you'd have to be turned in for possessing child porn. Since seeing it is potentially a crime, the public can't look at it to make a democratic decision if it is or if it isn't and you are left with the characterizations made in press conferences. The rule of where the line in drawn is done only behind closed doors. It is a catch-22 for democracy.
74 posted on 07/27/2005 5:39:44 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson