Replies

To: jdm

Is this the newer environmentally friendly foam that has failed since pretty much since it was installed?

27 posted on 07/27/2005 3:32:12 PM PDT by xmm0 (This post has been brought to you by the letters "U," "S," and "A" and Amendment number 1.)

To: xmm0

Is this the newer environmentally friendly foam that has failed since pretty much since it was installed?

Yes it is!

45 posted on 07/27/2005 3:36:03 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")

To: xmm0

"Is this the newer environmentally friendly foam that has failed since pretty much since it was installed?"

DING Ding ding........we have a winner

122 posted on 07/27/2005 4:03:46 PM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Shardenfreuden = Stratenshardenfreudenery)

To: xmm0

'Is this the newer environmentally friendly foam that has failed since pretty much since it was installed?'

That is what I was thinking.

351 posted on 07/27/2005 5:38:53 PM PDT by rawhide

To: xmm0

Is this the newer environmentally friendly foam that has failed since pretty much since it was installed?

YES..."the killer foam", the Eco-terrorists don't want US, up there anyway. :(

479 posted on 07/27/2005 9:34:53 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)

To: xmm0

Don't forget the possibility of the "enviro-friendly" low VOC or water-based primers as potential causes.

481 posted on 07/27/2005 9:41:33 PM PDT by aws1

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794