Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: salbam
What should a medical malpractice lawsuit be about if not recovery of money (and some other ancillary good results)?

Think now: are you honestly saying that attorneys should sue doctors when they don't think that they can prove negligence, or that even if negligence is proven, the plaintiff will only recover a small sum?

Go tell your wife that you are advocating that more lawsuits be filed against doctors. She'll love that.
227 posted on 07/26/2005 11:39:39 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: Iwo Jima

Lol. Unforuntately, to quote you directly "answers, which can only be gotten through a lawsuit" - it is you who is advocating that bad results mandate a lawsuit to get "answers". Lets jam the courts with lawsuits and watch the doctors scurry to the interstate to more friendly states (i.e. Indiana). You want the big $$$$. just be man enough to admit it. You don't want piddling $5000 verdicts - not worth your time. Bring on the big bucks sympathy cases - that is what you crave. I have enough relatives who are lawyers who tell me malpractice from horror stories of ethics gone wild. If you are proud of the John Edwards "Channelers" of the world, defend your profession. Can you honestly say that in court you are trying to present the MD fairly or are you trying to make him look like a heartless incompentent bastard?


229 posted on 07/26/2005 11:47:24 PM PDT by salbam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson