no mention of one - only a mystery whisper to "look into this". Not enough to hang an MD to dry out with in my opinion. Could be a disguntled nurse, a jealous colleague, etc. What happened to presumtion of innocence?
It remains where it belongs...in the courtroom.
The real mystery is at what point did you leap to the conclusion and outcome of a hypothetical legal proceeding? How did you arrive at "Not enough to hang an MD to dry out with..."
Mfreddy was asking for advice about retaining an attorney to formally investigate causes of his son's medical condition. Mfreddy did not imply nor did he say anything, nor can it be reasonably assumed that he intends to hang a physician out to dry.
Legal discovery can uncover much more than informal off the cuff opinions. The application of legal discovery is very technical in nature and time consuming.
Those whose medical performance might come into question already have attorneys in place so why shouldn't Mfreddy avail himself of the resources of competent counsel?
salbam wrote: "What happened to presumtion (sic) of innocence?"
Your Honor, I rest my case.