Thanks.
I'm following this, with interest. I've worked with a lot of doctors, some really fine people and some I wouldn't trust a cat with. I also have two attorneys in the family, a sister and a brother. Only one malpractice case between them, but it was a doozy, and it was hernia surgery by an impaired doctor who basically sterilized a nice young man.
I think some people have addressed this thread poster's concern and genuine question, and some have made him the scapegoat for ... whatever their personal agenda is.
Judith Anne -
My point has remained that the doctor is going to be presumed guilty by any "good" malpractice attorney. A John Edwards clone will "channel " the childs thoughts and play on the juries emotions to want to take care of this poor child. And he will have no qualms about destroying the life of what may be a competent and dedicated medical professional. Everyone here knows this