Yes, it IS self-explanatory. It is also why that second doctor has a STRONG disincentive from offering any opinion. Why engage in activity most commonly resulting in a suit? If he DOES take the consult, he has a strong incentive to say the first doctor was right.
Despite your accusation, I did not make anything up. Perhaps you need some rest.
Read again slowly - docotr's criticize other doctor's work if it is faulty every day. Especially if in another town or they dont know them Every day. They give their honest critique of how they would evaluate and treat things. you sure seem to give malpractice attorneys the benefit of the doubt but are quick to dispargage MD's. Am I on the Kerry -Edwards message board?