Huh? you may need some rest. Who said the independent medical expert had an incentive to avoid anything? you made that one up. I've worked at a university hosp, btw, and never had any contact with a hosp admin or lawyer to muzzle me or any other MD (I dont tell you about real estate law). And number 3, I have told Mfreddy not to run to a lawyer without any proof of negligence, not to avoid lawyers altogether. If he has proof, go for it. but if it is a fishing expedition, he has stopped researching at that point and become an advocate of a position - negligence. And you know thats true.
Lemme guess. You don't tell Petronski about real estate law because you're not a lawyer of any kind. You shouldn't be giving freddy advice about how to deal with his attorney either.
You said: "Number one cause of malpractice suits in the US? like to know? It is one doctor disparaging the work of another. Look it up." Tell me what you mean by that.
I've worked at a university hosp, btw, and never had any contact with a hosp admin or lawyer to muzzle me or any other MD
But as you've said, you've never been sued.
I have told Mfreddy not to run to a lawyer without any proof of negligence, not to avoid lawyers altogether. If he has proof, go for it.
Where/how would he get that proof?
He stated that he had some indications from people involved in his son's care that malpractice may have been a consideration.
That may not meet your criterion for "proof," but it would definitely indicate to me that I needed to consult an attorney.
Are you a doctor? A specialist?