That is why I suggested INDEPENDENT medical reviewers evaluate the case. No horse in the race. Any lawyer on either side is not interested in facts. I assume you agree.
They have their own horse in the race. They have to answer to hospital adminstrators and malpractice insurance attorneys and themselves about their involvement and formal opinions.
BTW, who is paying these uninvolved medical experts?
No sane medical doctor would consider professionally reviewing another medical doctor's case without first consulting his own private attorney.
Without personal legal representation, a medical doctor reviewing another doctor's case and then making a professional judgment and public statement based upon that review, could easily become a defendant in a libel case.