Posted on 07/25/2005 3:22:39 PM PDT by Alex Marko
I think that if there is no connection to any nation, the retaliation would be against the imams who preach terror.
I cannot believe that there would be no retaliation at all.
Yep. It's not appeasement to say that Tancredo's remarks, upon reflection, are a bit over the line. 1 billion angry muslims is nothing to sneeze at.
what we are currently doing is working....that doesnt mean we will have every victory any more than we had every victory in ww2
what you want is a victory that occurs within the one hour time limit of your favourite television show..you have no patience for how long this war will take, thus the infantile proposal of nuking mecca...you think tha twould shorten the war, what it will do instead it ensure it never ends
We should nuke Mecca NOW, not AFTER terrorists nuke us. Justify it under Bush's premptive strike doctrine. The Tancredo retaliatory MAD response is just so yesterday.
This is irritating you know.
I have a full time job and can't educate every delusional ignorant sandmaggot lover in the world, so pay attention.
Follow this link:
Please note that it all transpired 6 months before Tancredo was ambushed.
Explain the total absense of reaction from the current crop of world affairs experts on this thread...
I agree with you about Bush hurting the party but you must be kidding about CA & AZ? NM has ALWAYS had a huge problem with illegals. We have 48% LEGAL Mexicans. Can you imagine what it's going to be when we have the next amnesty.
I think TX has been inundated along with us. The people who are waking up are the one's who live far away from the border, and now that it's become an issue, people are realizing what a big problem it is.
I would rather put up with a Tancredo, than hear Bush calling the Minutemen vigilantes.
You and me too. I'm fed up with Bush's inaction. Tancredo spoke the truth, but some of the FR liberals aren't able to comprehend the truth. God knows how many more people have to die because of the borders being unsecured.
I like how these people just gloss over the fact that he was talking about a response to a nuclear attack on our cities.Only an idiot would be worried about offending the feelings of muslums after millions of Americans were incinerated.If this ever happened we should definitely hit the terror sponsoring states of Syria and Iran.We could also hit Saudi Arabia for their big part in supporting terror and be justified.We can't let the main backers of terror off the hook just because they didn't carry out the act directly.
They just don't know who they're _ _cking with. Once they do, it will be too late for them.
you quote WND, want to nuke mecca and you call me delusional?
yep, and diaperheads and their ilk "the religion of peace"...why does no politician expleain how every conv store and motel and gas station is owned and operated by a raghead and an American Citizen can't get a $100.00 loan to open up a taco stand??
He is only the beginning.
Tancredo was thoughtless.
Tancredo was stupid.
I agree.
OK FReepers, it's final: Tancredo is thoughtless and stupid. It must be true cuz CJ says so!!!
nuking MEccas isnt going to happen stop dreaming.
also Tancredo as i have written elsewhere has done tremendous damage to his cause of illegal immigration.
It will be easier now to villify those who want immigration controls.
Tancredo should go.
After reading your postings here, I can only conclude that you are totally "uninformed". Suggest you do some research and come back to us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.