[balrog666]

The author made a blanket statement about all religions; he did not single out "Young Earth Creationists." I am suggesting that the blanket statement is inaccurate, as even a brief perusing of Aquinas will show.

Yes, he said "religions" and not "religionists," so to speak. Aquinas is not a religion and therefore not a counterexample.

[B Knotts]

Obviously, a man (Aquinas) is not a religion. Did you use reason to arrive at that conclusion?

Aquinas has, however, been fairly influential on Christianity and Western Civilization.