Why are we giving Palestinian Terrorists money?
Posted on 07/25/2005 12:15:26 AM PDT by abu afak
Religiously motivated terrorism against America isn't new — in fact, it dates back hundreds of years.
By Chris Jeub
It may seem like the terrorist war against the United States is only a few weeks old, but radical Muslims’ hatred of our nation dates back centuries. In fact, it’s not the first time America has faced adversaries who were individual renegades instead of allied nations.
President Thomas Jefferson, for instance, faced threats from Islamic pirates who lived along Africa’s northern coast and daily terrorized European ships. When America won its independence, it too became a target for pirates — and Jefferson found himself forced into war.
But war against whom? Unknown pirates? African nations like Tripoli, Tunisia, Morocco and Algiers, which harbored the marauders but did not consider them citizens? Jefferson’s challenge resembles President Bush’s modern-day dilemma. Like today’s terrorists, the 19th-century pirates also were Muslims with an animosity toward Christians dating back to the Crusades.
The Muslim faith took root in northwestern Africa in the seventh century, and for generations the region served as a base for piracy — the looting and confiscation of ships as well as the murder of crew members. In the 19th century, European and American ships sailing around northern Africa paid tolls to the pirates for safe passage. This reign of terror went largely unchallenged until America took the lead — without the initial support of Europe.
War on Christianity
According to David Barton of WallBuilders, a Christian-heritage ministry in Aledo, Texas, the Barbary pirate raids stemmed more from prejudice against Christianity than from economic gain. “The numerous documents surrounding the Barbary Powers Conflict confirm that historically it always was viewed as a conflict between Christian America and Muslim nations,” Barton wrote in his 1996 book Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution & Religion.
U.S. Capt. William Eaton, in a letter to the secretary of state in 1805, explained why the Muslims were such dedicated foes:
Taught by revelation that war with the Christians will guarantee the salvation of their souls, and finding so great secular advantages in the observance of this religious duty [the secular advantage of keeping captured cargoes], their inducements to desperate fighting are very powerful.
Indeed, the countries whose ships were attacked — England, France, Spain, Denmark and the United States — all were predominately Christian. Nonetheless, Barton said, the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli declared the United States’ religious neutrality, “in an attempt to prevent further escalation of a ‘Holy War’ between Christians and Muslims.” Article XI of the treaty states that “the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion . . . it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of [Muslims].”
But the 1797 treaty failed, as did others. The Muslims, motivated by religious fervor, continued their attacks.
In 1815, the U.S. government sent a war hero, Stephen Decatur, to negotiate a more forceful treaty. Decatur had demonstrated his ability to thwart Barbary pirates a dozen years earlier; In 1804, on Jefferson’s orders, he led 74 volunteers into the Tripoli harbor and burned the captured American frigate Philadelphia. British Adm. Lord Nelson called the raid “the most daring act of the age.”
In the War of 1812, Decatur, the youngest captain in U.S. Navy history, defeated the British frigate Macedonian and brought the enemy vessel safely to the United States. It was the only captured British ship to be refitted and commissioned in the American Navy during that war.
Perhaps it was his reputation for victory that persuaded Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli to agree to Decatur’s terms and put an end to piracy. Perhaps it was his charm. John Quincy Adams described Decatur as “kind, warm-hearted, unassuming, gentle and hospitable, beloved in social life and with a soul totally and utterly devoted to his country.” Or maybe it was America’s naval power that outmatched Tripoli’s.
Whatever the cure, then, we can only pray that today’s war will rid the world of terrorism as America rid the world of piracy 200 years ago.
..........................................
Why are we giving Palestinian Terrorists money?
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
Same here.
This lie has been used over and over by the pseudocons to justify their war in Iraq. Jefferson never used the Barbary pirates as an excuse to topple foreign governments, to engage in nation-building or to spread democracy across the globe. Upon congressional authorization, he took specific action against a specific enemy for a specific purpose, that being the defense of the United States.
Quite welcome to yopu and others.
Ignore the last response of a neocon conspiracist before this one
"""..Well dang -- I'll be.
I remember reading the biography of Stephen Decatur as a kid, and his adventures defeating the pirates.
I don't recall them mentioning that this was a religious war, with the Christian Americans fighting the Islamic Terrorists who thought they could go to heaven by killing Christians, and with the Americans having to save the European backsides.
Somethings never change. And somethings never seem to get reported honestly."""""
The World and History has become So PC- we look to bleach rather than enlighten and see common threads.
I just don't get this sentence. Who thinks terrorism against the US is only weeks old?
This article will appear in the November 2001 issue of Citizen magazine.
raiding ships to take booty, does not constitute hatred of a nation.
Jefferson was so bad. He got America into a quagmire in North Africa and then declared the mission accomplished. Why didn't we just "negotiate" and pay tribute like the Europeans???
Ping
Perhaps. But to claim that the person you robbed or killed deserved to be robbed or killed by reason of not being Muslim is, in modern parlance, a "Hate Crime".
To try to equate this with modern terrorism and lay it on the Christian-Moslem hostilities seems convoluted at best.
I see that like a lot of Islamic apologists that have raised their rag strewn heads on these boards that you too believe in a digital view of history, rather than analog. Islam was born with the intent of eliminating all other religions, sooner or later.
I know so then they all became pirates. Get your head out of it and smell the coffee.
No, Buccaneers. And it's obvious that you wouldn't qualify, because you don't seem to have much between your "buccanears".
I wouldn't exactly call them a threat to America. More like an annoyance. They weren't about to sail up the Delaware River and sack Philadelphia.
Had the modern neocons existed back then, I'm sure they would have tried to frighten people with just such a possibility:
"Either you are with us, or you are with the pirates."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.