Replies

Well, there's exhibit A ladies and gentleman.

First, I barely mentioned Rove in passing, and it was relevant to what I was saying. Anyone can go back and see that it wasn't the diversion you turned it in to. I won't get dragged back in to arguing side points which you keep insisting on doing because everything you've said has been throughly challenged and you have nothing left to say.

Second, I never mentioned Bush Sr., and I don't believe I ever mentioned Clinton either (although he and his wife are two of the leading Dims who spent the years leading up to the war making the same and often stronger arguments about Saddam's WMDs.) So you've just once again been proven to have nothing so you reply to something I never mentioned.

It's funny really, if anyone is actually reading this exchange thoroughly... They'll see your initial question to another user. My fairly detailed responses. Then your diverting every which way without ever spending one sentence on replying to my point. Folks, I think I've wasted to much time on this guy already... I suggest reading our exchange over the past few comments and familiarize yourselves so you don't make the same mistake.