Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAquinas

I am not an open borders person.

I was just using that as an analogy - suppose we had no immigration issue with mexico - no one was coming here from mexico. then what would border security be for? national security. what are the odds of stopping a small terrorist team from crossing, short of building the Berlin wall across 1000s of miles? very low odds. so does that mean we should have no border security, because the odds of catching a bad guy is low? of course not.


559 posted on 07/22/2005 4:46:50 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

"I was just using that as an analogy - suppose we had no immigration issue with mexico - no one was coming here from mexico. then what would border security be for?"

What do you mean by "no immigration issue with mexico?"

But anyway, this is not the case - we do have immigration issues with Mexico and the rest of the third world who's allowed to pour their unwanted, undesirable elements into our country. Legal immigration is a bigger issue than illegal immigration. Illegal immigration is a short-term problem, hopefully, while legal immigration is a critical long-term, state-sanctioned issue. Illegal immigrants shoul be deported to their respective countries and should not have been allowed to enter through our lax borders. Legal immigration laws must be changed to what they were prior to the paasge of the '65 Immigration Act.


564 posted on 07/22/2005 5:03:54 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences: Tom Tancredo for President 2008/2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson