Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beltfed308
The next arguement will be that because it is a public road they should be able to search your vehicle or you cannot use it. Slippery slope and people here are eating it up.

There's a difference between public transportation and a private vehicle. No slippiness here.

258 posted on 07/22/2005 12:15:02 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: SandyInSeattle
Public road. Same argument.
268 posted on 07/22/2005 12:18:05 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle

Quote: There's a difference between public transportation and a private vehicle. No slippiness here.



Your wrong it's called incrementalism. In Ohio 10 years ago they had a voluntary campaign to get people to wear seatbelts. Then they came out with a law that stated you could get a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt ONLY if they pulled you over for another crime like speeding etc and noticed you were not wearing a belt.

Today in Ohio the troopers can pull you over for just not wearing a belt and ticket you.


283 posted on 07/22/2005 12:23:10 PM PDT by superiorslots (Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle

They could always hire a private company to run the subway system. Then let the private company set criteria for entry of a train. Then, no government entity would be involved.


312 posted on 07/22/2005 12:30:42 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson