Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blame Blair or Bush, not the bombers
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 7/22/5 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 07/22/2005 7:51:10 AM PDT by SmithL

LONDON MAYOR Ken Livingstone was positively Churchillian in his response to the July 7 bombings. Rather than blaming British or Israeli policies for terrorist attacks on innocent civilians -- his usual M.O. -- Livingstone condemned the bombings as "mass murder" aimed "at ordinary working- class Londoners" on the day of the attacks.

This week, even before Thursday's attempted bombings, Livingstone was back to his old nasty self. On Wednesday, he told BBC where he placed blame for the bombings: "We have just had 80 years of Western intervention in predominantly Arab lands, because of the Western need for oil."

Red Ken -- as British papers call him -- also blamed "those governments which use indiscriminate slaughter to advance their foreign policy, as we have occasionally seen with the Israeli government." Oh, and he blamed the United States for helping the Afghans fight off a Soviet occupation -- which makes Americans the "creators" of Osama bin Laden.

That is, at first Livingstone blamed the bombers. Then, he blamed everyone but the bombers.

In response, the Daily Telegraph ran Livingstone's mug next to those of Islamic radicals Sheik Omar Bakri Mohamed and Anjem Choudary under the heading "The men who blame Britain." Mohamed blamed British voters and mainstream British Muslims for the bombings while Choudary, the New York Times reported, predicted another attack.

Sounds familiar. Livingstone typifies a certain stripe of lefty who so hates President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair that he or she makes excuses for murderers.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: kenlivingstone; london; londonattacked; redken; terrorsupporter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Red Ken is a supporter of terrorism.
1 posted on 07/22/2005 7:51:11 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How is it that sfgate sometimes appears sane?


2 posted on 07/22/2005 7:53:32 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I thought, at first, that the Lord Mayor had some sand. Now, it seems, he is a coward and a dunce. Londoners deserve far better than this bonehead.


3 posted on 07/22/2005 7:53:45 AM PDT by RexBeach (Pardon me, but is that a malaise sandwich in your pocket or are you just glad to be in a funk?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I thought, at first, that the Lord Mayor had some sand. Now, it seems, he is a coward and a dunce. Londoners deserve far better than this bonehead.


4 posted on 07/22/2005 7:54:20 AM PDT by RexBeach (Pardon me, but is that a malaise sandwich in your pocket or are you just glad to be in a funk?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.


5 posted on 07/22/2005 7:54:58 AM PDT by iceskater ("Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind." - Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl

That old "stopped clock is still right twice a day" thing.


6 posted on 07/22/2005 7:55:22 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This week, even before Thursday's attempted bombings, Livingstone was back to his old nasty self. On Wednesday, he told BBC where he placed blame for the bombings: "We have just had 80 years of Western intervention in predominantly Arab lands, because of the Western need for oil."

Well, since doing business and helping nations develop is considered "intervention" then let's deport every muslim back to a "muslim" country, build a huge wall around the whole rotten mess and let them fester and destroy themselves without any intervention. The Iran-Iraq war is just one example of what will happen behind that wall. 50 years or so should be just about long enough for them to wipe themselves out...then the rest of the can remove the walls, bury the dead and use the now empty lands as the world sees fit...maybe as a museum to the evil of Islam.

7 posted on 07/22/2005 7:56:46 AM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"We have just had 80 years of Western intervention in predominantly Arab lands, because of the Western need for oil."

I'm getting sick of this argument. It is all about supply and demand. If we didn't buy oil from these people, what else would they supply to be able to buy food for their people? Our buying oil gives all these middle eastern countries a higher quality of life than if we pulled out.
8 posted on 07/22/2005 7:57:46 AM PDT by mnehring (Fourth Estate, Fifth Column Dis-Infomers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl
The Chronicle has a couple of sane writers. I like Debra, even though I frequently disagree with her (she supported Gray Davis, for instance). Cinnamon Stillwell is a gem. She became a conservative on 9/11, and I love her witings.
9 posted on 07/22/2005 7:58:42 AM PDT by SmithL (There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

He needs a good nail bomb up his ...


10 posted on 07/22/2005 8:01:16 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl

Yeah, but the headline is so misleading... I almost blew a fuse just reading it.


11 posted on 07/22/2005 8:01:23 AM PDT by Thrusher (Remember the Mog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Oh, and he blamed the United States for helping the Afghans fight off a Soviet occupation -- which makes Americans the "creators" of Osama bin Laden.

forget the part about creating OBL being nonsense, wouldn't helping the Afghans repel a Soviet invasion be a good thing in the eyes of the Muslims?

12 posted on 07/22/2005 8:04:37 AM PDT by Smedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Red Ken is a supporter of terrorism.

Red Ken is a bunch of idiots ... which one in particular is manifesting at the moment depends on the dominant voice in his head at the time.

13 posted on 07/22/2005 8:05:41 AM PDT by tx_eggman (Does it hurt when they shear your wool off?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

He is one of the jihadists' "useful idiots".


14 posted on 07/22/2005 8:06:32 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Who is the worse traitor to freedom loving Brits?

George Galloway
or
(Red) Ken Livingstone
15 posted on 07/22/2005 8:07:57 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl
How is it that sfgate sometimes appears sane?

The old broken clock....?

16 posted on 07/22/2005 8:08:22 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

They're equally bad.

Regards, Ivan


17 posted on 07/22/2005 8:10:39 AM PDT by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Ken Livingstone was positively Churchillian

He is always Churchillian. Occasionally it's Winston, but more often it's Ward.

18 posted on 07/22/2005 8:10:56 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smedley

"Wouldn't helping the Afghans repel a soviet invasion be a good thing in the eye's of muslims?"Yes i'd think so,but keep in mind were not dealing with logical people:)


19 posted on 07/22/2005 8:11:29 AM PDT by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
... bury the dead and use the now empty lands as the world sees fit...maybe as a museum to the evil of Islam.

I say build a theme park for radical extremist muslims. We could give them Islamo-Disney. Rides like the "Haj-go-round" or "The Jihad", where extremist can slap on an explosive belt and blow themselves up in a simulated Israeli pizza parlor full of children. Add an "Infidel shooting gallery" (like those duck shooting galleries) where the faithful can shhot at little cardboard infidels.

There are endless possibilities in adapting out videogame technologies to suit the Islamofascist.

any other suggestions?

20 posted on 07/22/2005 8:11:41 AM PDT by Smedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson