I presume he gave her classified information the same way I know he gave Corn and Kristof classified information.
As for the memo, no I don't care because it fails to enlighten anyone of who in the CIA was speaking to reporters and I said it could have been a set up to find that question out? When you find the statement of who I said actually wrote it then I will stand corrected but even if that is the case it doesn't change the facts that Wilson had been speaking to reporters and reporters had been speaking to sources inside the CIA.
I will guarantee that no matter how much you want it to be someone in the administration it's not and my source from the MSM has it absolutely correct!
I think I get what you are saying - maybe. The info he gave to Kristof about his visit, and whatever you think he gave to Corn, and what you think he gave to Miller - is it any different than what he put in his op-ed? Because he was given permission to write that. As for who wrote the memo, I don't think we have a name, but SSIC did say that it came from INR, based upon the notes of an INR guy who was in the meeting. If you need a name to conclude that the SSIC is not making that up, I don't think you are going to get it. Of course, you don't have a name of the CIA person you are claiming wrote it, do you?
I don't 'want it' to be someone in the admin - I just don't understand how people can say it came from journalists, etc. It had to initially come from someone with a clearance. If either came from Plame/Wilson, or it came from someone in the Admin... I don't think either Wilson or Plame is a complete idiot, so if they were telling Miller, it would be remarkably stupid to raise a huge stink and blame it on someone else, and call for an investigation.
Anyway, I do think the scenario you are painting defies Occam's Razor.