[Arkie2]

Go Chuckie! Ask your stupid questions and show the voters how petty and vindictive the Democratic party is.

You da man!

[SERKIT]

We need judges, not pre-judges. Up-Chuck Schumer can ask any questions he wants, but how could anyone get a fair hearing if a judge's prejudgment is now prior knowledge?

Judges need to judge each case based on the merits of each case, otherwise, why have judges? Can Chuckie be held in contempt for forcing judges to ask contemptible questions?

Hypothetically, if Bubba had 6 (or even all 9), openings in the Supremes, would the radical left insist that the court MUST HAVE 4 conservatives, 4 leftists, and one spineless swing-judge? Yeah right!

GWB will have something Bubba never had and never will have, and that's a legacy.

[SERKIT]

We need judges, not pre-judges. Up-Chuck Schumer can ask any questions he wants, but how could anyone get a fair hearing if a judge's pre-judgment is now prior knowledge?

Judges need to judge each case based on the merits of each case, otherwise, why have judges? Can Chuckie be held in contempt for forcing judges to answer contemptable questions?

Hypothetically, if Bubba had 6 (or even all 9), openings in the Supremes, would the radical left insist that the court MUST HAVE 4 conservatives, 4 leftists, and one spineless swing-judge? Yeah right!

GWB will have something Bubba never had and never will have, and that's a legacy.