To: MacDorcha
You challenged my statement that Darwinian evolution through natural selection had not been seen in the lab.
You were wrong.
Now you want to parse about "Macro" vs "Micro" evolution. You can have your fish eating a fish with feet on the back of your car; but once you admit that there are fish with feet you've already lost most of the argument.
94 posted on
07/20/2005 9:54:49 AM PDT by
Mylo
("Those without a sword should sell their cloak and buy one" Jesus of Nazareth)
To: Mylo
Only if you assume that I'm an advocate of Sunday school creationism. You set up a straw man argument that its 7 day creation or evolution by natural selection. Its just not true. Evolutionists can even explain common biochemical reactions such as blood clotting within the frame of evolution.
105 posted on
07/20/2005 10:05:07 AM PDT by
blackfarm
(blackfamily5)
To: Mylo
Actually, I DIDN'T challenge your observations.
I challenged what they meant.
And you might want to look at who your original post was to, because I don't recall being a part of it until I butted in just then.
Any problems you have with the other person's reasoning, go ahead and address it to them. As far as we're concerned, you still haven't addressed if they are indeed a different species or not.
145 posted on
07/20/2005 11:20:41 AM PDT by
MacDorcha
(In Theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson