Skip to comments.
MSNBC DAN ABRAMS RE: JUDGE ROBERTS: "YOU LOOK AT THE NANNY. YOU LOOK AT WHETHER HE SMOKED POT.
Transcript MSNBCTV Situation w/Tucker Carlson/Dan Abrams ^
| July 20, 2005
| transcript
Posted on 07/20/2005 8:06:21 AM PDT by KE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Later in the interview Abrams said: "I thinkI think theyre going to have to find something beyond his legal philosophy."
Just more drastic tactics the Dems might use ! Well, there's no "might use" about it. Dan Abrams suggesting that this is all the dems might have !!!
1
posted on
07/20/2005 8:06:22 AM PDT
by
KE
To: KE
Roberts has been vetted 3 or 4 times already. FBI background checks, the full cavity search by the federal government.
There is no nannygate (Baird, Woods, Chavez)
There is no pot (Doug Gisberg)
There's nothing. This man makes white bread look wild.
2
posted on
07/20/2005 8:08:59 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
To: KE
"YOU LOOK AT THE NANNY. YOU LOOK AT WHETHER HE SMOKED POT., KE wrote: "
Gee, do they think that maybe Bush hasn't thought of that?
Of course they are Demonrats. I guess that nanny taxes could be made up, old police records made up and planted, the Reichstag burned?
To: KE
And he joined with ahe joined with an unlikely alliance in that case, which wouldnt be the ordinary case. He was going to say a liberal but realized that wouldn't sound good and so changed it to "an unlikely alliance". LOL
4
posted on
07/20/2005 8:14:28 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: KE
He was working for Ken Starr. Ken Starr...Gasp!!! Couple this with the little girl with the french fries...
5
posted on
07/20/2005 8:19:15 AM PDT
by
socal_parrot
(Tina Delgado is alive! ALIVE!)
To: dubyaismypresident
What if his nanny smoked pot?
To: KE
ABRAME: YOU LOOK AT THE NANNY.
So thats why Bush didn't nominate Jude Law.
7
posted on
07/20/2005 8:21:06 AM PDT
by
hflynn
( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
To: KE
If he never smoked pot, he's out of the mainstream.
8
posted on
07/20/2005 8:21:38 AM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(Welcome to Sherwood Forest.)
To: dubyaismypresident
Politics of personal destruction will not work in this case!
To: dubyaismypresident
Not so fast! Would Roberts be willing to testify that he has never had impure thoughts.
10
posted on
07/20/2005 8:22:19 AM PDT
by
Jersey Jim
(Jersey really is a nice place..........well, maybe not)
To: KE
I think this might explain why Schumer looked so pale when he issued his "statement." It's going to be difficult to attack this man.
11
posted on
07/20/2005 8:22:32 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: HereInTheHeartland
"YOU LOOK AT THE NANNY. YOU LOOK AT WHETHER HE SMOKED POT., KE wrote: "
Gee, do they think that maybe Bush hasn't thought of that?
Remember the left's mantra: Fake, but accurate. It doesnt have to be REAL or truthful. It can be made up. The Rove situation proves that. They have a month or more to make somthing up. Dont tell me its not going to happen.
To: KE
"YOU LOOK AT THE NANNY."LOL--A 'Rat would indeed "look at the nanny"--or the intern...
Abrams is proof (as if we needed it) that the media is in bed with the 'Rats in hopes of tripping this President up.
13
posted on
07/20/2005 8:25:10 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: BoBToMatoE
Yes, dear Hubby and I were discussing that this morning. Expect special "documents" from the Dan Rather Document Manufacturing Co. in the future. However, they might have been shredded to protect the source. ;)
14
posted on
07/20/2005 8:26:25 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: MizSterious
"I think this might explain why Schumer looked so pale when he issued his "statement." He knows he is being sent to fight a losing fight, to the further harm of his party as obstructionists with no ideas. The hardcore left (NOW, MorOn...er, MoveOn, NARAL etc.) are going nuclear with this pick. Thanks to the 'net, they've got hundreds of thousands of misguided souls slamming all of the 'Rats to fight this pick to the death. I'd hate to be a staffer for a 'Rat senator right now....
15
posted on
07/20/2005 8:26:56 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
To: dubyaismypresident
Roberts will still receive this, and all the way up to his tonsils...
16
posted on
07/20/2005 8:28:27 AM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Like a fool, I looked up from 'neath the tree as the bird chirped...Vogelspooren)
To: eureka!
"...to the death..." I like the sound of that. It might well end up being the death rattle of the 'Rat party in its current incarnation.
17
posted on
07/20/2005 8:28:57 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: MizSterious
Oh, they'll be around for a while. As long as they are just screaming and not governing, I'm happy...
18
posted on
07/20/2005 8:39:56 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
To: KE
YOU LOOK AT THE NANNY I heard members of some of those feminist groups REALLY love to look at Fran Dresher. But how will that help?
19
posted on
07/20/2005 8:42:40 AM PDT
by
AbeKrieger
(Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
To: KE
20
posted on
07/20/2005 10:49:07 AM PDT
by
jonno
(We are NOT a democracy - though we are democratic. We ARE a constitutional republic.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson