There was nothing erroneous about either of my comments.
And you said, "If it's fair game to say that her article is correct, that she looks great and that here is a picture of her, then why isn't also fair game by people who don't think her article is correct and who think that she's too skinny to say so?"
That certainly sounds like you're excusing them to me. The only time personal insults are appropriate are responding in kind.
"Nearly 800 posts, and Ms. Coulter's opposition almost never stops going after the woman as a chicken-legged drunkard who never loved Bush to begin with."
Your irrelevant aside on Hillary's legs notwithstanding, my sureness in my comments is only reinforced by your statements above, where you demonstrate that while you might not have agreed in your posts with those who denigrated her person, you certainly agreed with them in spirit. You certainly haven't disagreed with them by supporting them, unless there's some logic trick I missed where you wave a wand and doing A=doing B.
We could've gotten another Thomas, now it's all about settling for nominees who seem like they'll get through.
And all the hard work we did for a Republican majority was for....