[LibertarianInExile]

What were you thinking, posting this?

Nearly 800 posts, and Ms. Coulter's opposition almost never stops going after the woman as a chicken-legged drunkard who never loved Bush to begin with. How proud they must be to have demonstrated the "big tent" under which they claim Roberts falls, especially when the only argument Ann raises is that the GOP base deserved assurance and they got temperance, that the tactics here were not her own preference and that those chosen tactics have failed to satisfy constitution-loving supporters of the GOP in the past.

Surely their extended vituperation must have proven her wrong. These cannot be just the all-too-typical attacks on the person that seem to have become common in this forum whenever Bush's actions are disagreed with by anyone, regardless of their conservative credentials. Thank goodness we can expect moderators to correct such discourteous postings where they went over the line. I hope that Ann enjoyed her little foray into the FR forum to see this and appreciated how much those moderators did to ensure she wasn't Slandered herself.

[sirthomasthemore]

Great post!!!Proud to know you, Reb. -:)




TAGLINES

Pzifer: “Viagra won’t cause dementia or blindness". (Except if one wears a Black Robe)

Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-

Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we can’t GET OUT of terrorism.

[FreeReign]

Nearly 800 posts, and Ms. Coulter's opposition almost never stops going after the woman as a chicken-legged drunkard who never loved Bush to begin with.

I opposed certain aspects of Coulter's article. I never called her chicken-legged or drunkard. Many other posters also opposed aspects of her article and never resorted to these personal attacks.

Yet you quantify Coulter's opposition as posters who "almost never stops going after the woman as a chicken-legged drunkard".

The initial posters on this thread who mention Culter's looks were supporters of her article. They are the ones who brought up the subject of Coulter's physical appearence. If it's fair game to say that her article is correct, that she looks great and that here is a picture of her, then why isn't also fair game by people who don't think her article is correct and who think that she's too skinny to say so? Why don't you criticize the posters who thought "skinny-good-looks" was germain to this debate and who thought posting pictures of Coulters "slender-beauty" was germaine to this debate.

BTW, I just looked at the first 50 posts on this thread. One poster said she was too skinny and no posters said that she was a drunkard. Yet in those same 50 posts we had about a handful of pro-article people who initiated the physical attribute debate by posting pictures of her. Yet you say the following;

You:Nearly 800 posts, and Ms. Coulter's opposition almost never stops going after the woman as a chicken-legged drunkard who never loved Bush to begin with.

You are what you complain about.