To: street_lawyer
I think Bush wants to get a conservative securely on the Court before he nominates someone who's a bit edgy or outspoken, like Edith Jones or what's-her-name Brown. So I think mild-mannered Roberts is the safest conservative choice, which is why he's the first. The Dems will fight harder against a woman or a minority, especially an outspoken one, because they think they own them.
To: Steve_Seattle
Edith Jones was passed over for Souter. Just pointing this out.
I hope Roberts is the conservative people are talking about.
Great pick if Roberts is (Young, smart and well qualified) and I do think the Souter mistake by father Bush made the son think twice.
423 posted on
07/20/2005 9:42:33 AM PDT by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
To: Steve_Seattle
I think Bush wants to get a conservative securely on the Court before he nominates someone who's a bit edgy or outspoken, like Edith Jones or what's-her-name Brown.I agree, and here's my preferred scenario:
1. Roberts is nominated and confirmed.
2. Rehnquist retires.
3. President Bush nominates Clarence Thomas for Chief Justice.
4. President Bush nominates Janet Rogers Brown to fill the vacant seat.
5. We pop some popcorn, sit back, and watch the Democrats' heads explode.
425 posted on
07/20/2005 9:44:11 AM PDT by
sima_yi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson