To: rwfromkansas
I am shocked Ann wrote an article like this without doing any research or using her brain. Roberts is not Souter 2. Just isn't. That's it. Why????? Because you said? Show me any piece of evidence except that which is taken from a legal brief showing Roberts' view on Roe v. Wade, the Second Amendment, or the COmmerce clause.
305 posted on
07/20/2005 8:41:12 AM PDT by
Texas Federalist
(No matter what my work/play ratio is, I am never a dull boy.)
To: Texas Federalist
The French Fry ruling seemed to indicate that Roberts follows the law even if the PR might make him look bad.
To: Texas Federalist
Perhaps you should actually read some of his rulings.
330 posted on
07/20/2005 8:51:20 AM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson