ping
I hope the author of the song keeps his/her word.
One less DU'er is nothing to be upset about!!
Good thing they all believe in the Right to Die.
Even dumber, they're still waiting for Fitzgerald ( who said Rove was not a target ) to get Rove indited for not committing a crime. (huh?)
I always regarded this as a great song and a fit ironic opening to a great movie.
2. We have 5 weeks to prepare for that battle....... at this moment we are locked in another battle that may make the other moot. We must concentrate on Plamegate and not be distracted by this Neanderthal selection. For now. There will be a time and place for that battle, but it is not now.
In 5 weeks there may be no bush White House left. THAT is what we must concentrate on now.
Can someone tell me what DU is?
38. All I needed to hear was this guy was involved in the 2000 *recount*
I want to claw my own eyes out and then dip my head in lye but what difference would THAT make?
Because behind him bush will have a myriad of nutcases and extremists and loons and eventually one of them will be confirmed--so what is the point of directing the media into a frenzy at the expense of rovegate and Iraq-gate etc.
I see doing that as giving the rove team exactly what it wants currently.
I say the hell with this and stay on the trail of bush's assorted crimes, because we will be stuck with some ****head of bush's choosing on the supreme court anyway.
NARAL: Roberts Will Overturn Roe v. Wade - ("feminazis" screaming for scalps already!)
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JULY 19, 2005 | Staff Writers
Posted on 07/19/2005 8:55:06 PM PDT by CHARLITE
NARAL, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, immediately lashed out at President Bush's nominee for the Supreme Court.
"If Roberts is confirmed to a lifetime appointment, there is little doubt that he will work to overturn Roe v. Wade," a NARAL statement said Tuesday night.
"As deputy solicitor general under the first President Bush, he argued to the Supreme Court that 'Roe was wrongly decided and should be overruled,' " NARAL also claimed. Abortion will likely be the most contentious issue surrounding Judge Roberts and his nomination.
When Bush nominated Roberts to the D.C. Court of Appeals in 2003, NARAL complained:
"We believe he was nominated in large measure because of his narrow view of constitutional rights, and it is for this same reason that the Senate should reject his nomination."
The pro-abortion group was particularly irked by Roberts' argument: "The Court's conclusion in Roe that there is a fundamental right to an abortion finds no support in the text, structure, or history of the Constitution."
Republicans control the Senate's Judiciary Committee by 10-to-8, and the full Senate with 55 seats.
Unless the Democrats filibuster, Roberts is a clear favorite to win confirmation.
If the Democrats do launch a filibuster, Republicans may finally unleash "the nuclear option" and do away with the Senate rule that allows a minority to block the majority will.
NOW Protests Nomination of John Roberts
NOW email to supporters | July 19, 2005 | NOW
Posted on 07/19/2005 8:41:24 PM PDT by rgorman
JOIN the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wednesday, July 20th at 10:00 am for a demonstration against the nomination of anti abortion rights John Roberts to the United States Supreme Court!
Dirksen Senate Office Building - Senate Swamp Constitution and First St SE 10:00 am
The United States Senate must NOT confirm John Roberts. Let's show our support for women's rights.
Perhaps they could get some ideas from this
http://unix.rulez.org/~calver/pictures/bunny_suicides/