why? what is there in his record that leads you to believe this?
There's an outside chance he could become a Kennedy ... same is true of almost any nominee.
see question above
My take is that he's not quite a Scalia, most likely a Rehnquist ... and that's not half bad.
a) see question above again. b) why are conservatives always willing to settle for less than they should & liberals never willing to compromise on anything?
Souter was an aberration ... a stupid choice made on the recommendation of one or two New Hampshire RINO hacks.
Roberts is much more widely known, and everyone who knows him says he is conservative.
Ed Meese knows and likes him, for instance, and Meese was one of the leaders in the opposition to Gonzales. Levin, Hewitt, and all the folks at National Review give him enthusiastic thumbs up.
I don't know that he's another Scalia, but I wouldn't rule out the possibility.