[Bubbatuck]

this worries me. Yahoo reported that he stated in his appellate confirmation that:

"Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. ... There is nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent."

[Smedley]

"Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. ... There is nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent."

This is what an Appellant judge should do -- follow the law. A USSC justice, on the other hand, gets to make the final guess.

[NilesJo]

this worries me. Yahoo reported that he stated in his appellate confirmation that:
"Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. ... There is nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent."

Not to worry, He didn't say he agreed with the decision. Here he was speaking as an Appellate judge who is expected to apply the law as determined by the USSC. However, as a SC justice he could join a majority, if one emerged and the right case presented, to overthrow Roe.