Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lemondropkid31
Clement was a Souter-type. We really don't know what she thinks, and I have heard that she agreed with Roe V Wade

Good.

Personally, I could care less about the abortion issue. I would GLADLY accept a pro-abortion SCOTUS Justice as long as they were a strict Constitutionalist on law and order, property rights, gun rights, reverse discrimination, et al.

2,048 posted on 07/19/2005 4:04:22 PM PDT by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (The Republican'ts have no spine--they ALWAYS cave-in to the RATs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1690 | View Replies ]


To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
I would GLADLY accept a pro-abortion SCOTUS Justice as long as they were a strict Constitutionalist on law and order, property rights, gun rights, reverse discrimination, et al.

Just so wrong. If the basic right to life is out the window, the foundation crumbles - just as it is now.

2,064 posted on 07/19/2005 4:06:41 PM PDT by don-o (Don't be a Freeploader. Do the right thing and become a Monthly Donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2048 | View Replies ]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
I would GLADLY accept a pro-abortion SCOTUS Justice as long as they were a strict Constitutionalist on law and order, property rights, gun rights, reverse discrimination, et al.

How pray tell could a strict Constitutionalist not vote to overturn Roe v Wade?

2,065 posted on 07/19/2005 4:06:43 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2048 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson