Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NutCrackerBoy
The NYT has been very adamant that Miller's source is not herself. Read between that line.

I'm going to need a little assistance to read between that line. How could Miller's source be on not be herself?

Miller, as a journalist, and Plame, as a CIA employee, both specialized in investigating the proliferation of WMD's. I suspect that they knew each other because of this shared interest. I'm going with Plame being Miller's source.

16 posted on 07/19/2005 6:02:51 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Quilla
The NYT has been very adamant that Miller's source is not herself. Read between the lines. They know who the source is. There is a criminal investigation and it involves someone in the Administration who is almost certainly not Karl Rove. -NutCrackerBoy

I'm going to need a little assistance to read between that line. How could Miller's source be or not be herself?

National Review seriously floated the theory that Judith Miller was protecting herself. The New York Times responded in a manner I thought rather shrill, actually calling the accusation "mean-spirited".

I don't categorically reject all such theories - I think they fit the facts as well as any, if you discount what the Times itself says.

But at the end of the day anything is a long shot other than Judith Miller has information that is relevant to possible criminal act by a member of the Administration.

33 posted on 07/19/2005 9:27:15 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson