Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Don't bother -- he's a DU troll whose only interest is to see Bush and GOPers lose. An "indepedent voice" my ass.

Another genius who attempts to persuade us with "reason" while lying and deceiving about his very identity. Typical Democrat fraud.

96 posted on 07/19/2005 9:47:07 AM PDT by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Jhensy
I asked him/her/them the questions so the psychotic answers could be taken apart.

Hey, free119 terrorists - you are truly a schizophrenic piece of work!

Well, here are a few of his gems of wisdom, just for posterity:

The terrorists attacks were, of course, just that: ruthless, murderous attacks on mostly innocent people.

Oh, MOSTLY innocent people. So, in your fake humble opinion, some of them deserved to be mercilessly slaughtered by terrorists.

However, it is important to realize who did it and for what reasons.

I asked him what were the causes of terrorism. He never did get around to revealing what they were. He never mentioned the Koran, either.

I don't think my personal point of view is very interesting, and certainly not relevant.

If it's not relevant, you certainly place a great deal of faith in it. Oh, I get it! All this steaming pile isn't your opinion, it's TRUTH with a capital T!

I can answer your questions anyway, but I don't feel they have any significant meaning for the things being discussed (here and elsewhere in this forum).

Here is a shining example of real psychosis (Howeird, is this you?). His opinion is worthless, he admits it, but at the same time has full faith in his worthless opinion.

Yes, I am glad that Saddam is removed from power, although I certainly am not glad about any persons death, including his sons.

A very ancient, very wise book states that even saints are happy when poisonous snakes and scorpions are killed, in reference to an evil tyrant being killed. All upright people in the world were very happy when Saddams' evil sons were removed forcibly from mother earth. The fact that you want them to live shows your total lack of moral compass.

I would rather have seen them held responsible for their deeds.

Don't worry your pretty little head, they are being held responsible as we speak.

If the Iraqi people now have a system of government they can choose for themselves remains to be seen.

Well, when Saddam was in power, they could vote, but it had to be for him alone. Now they have choices! Plus, under Saddam, anyone who didn't vote was punished severely. No one is punished now for not voting! Note the difference?

Currently, many of them don't even have the minimum security and living conditions that are needed to exercise any kind of freedom.

Since under Saddam's rule, people were raped, fed into shredders, fed to dogs and wild animals, tortured in innumerable ways, as well as not having many of the basic necessities of a life of poverty, any sane person (including the vast majority of the actual Iraqies) feel their life vastly improved. The fact that you don't see the improvement shows that you have lost your mind.

Of course Saddam killed a lot of people, including Iraqis. I don't just mean any he killed personally, but particularly those he killed by setting the policies and giving the initial orders to do so.

How do you know he didn't kill any personally, just as an aside?

As did George Bush Sr, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, in that (chronological) order.

See what he's saying, O lurkers? He's saying that GWB is just as bad a murderer as Saddam. Liberalism is a mental illness, and the farther left, the worse the mental disease.

All of this just being my personal opinion, only offered because you asked for it, and of no particular relevance to anything.

If you really think your opinion has no relevance, GIVE IT UP and believe in truth instead of lies. (Moderator, I hope you don't mind that I quoted the troll, I just had to tear apart some of his insanity.)

134 posted on 07/19/2005 3:39:41 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson