To: jveritas
I'd take Clement over O'conner. So this would be a net positive. Can't have all I want as fast as I want it, but incrementalism has worked for liberals for a century, we've been peeling it back the past couple of decades. I'll take it and will remain optimistic. Sure I might have other preferences, but I wont get upset if its Clement over Jones.
527 posted on
07/19/2005 8:07:19 AM PDT by
Paradox
(Its a good thing that even when you dismiss the existence of God, he doesn't dismiss you.)
To: Paradox
That is an intelligent assessment and analysis.
529 posted on
07/19/2005 8:09:43 AM PDT by
jveritas
(The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
To: Paradox
To: Paradox
I'd take Clement over O'conner. This kind of reasoning will also get us Gonzales for Stevens and will leave us basically unchanged. We need 3 conservative nominees, not three more conservative nominees than the justice they are replacing.
541 posted on
07/19/2005 8:28:25 AM PDT by
Texas Federalist
(No matter what my work/play ratio is, I am never a dull boy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson