Hehe, us in South Dakota have already put it up and it passed, but the governor was concerned about the cost of defending the law in the SCOTUS as well as our law didn't have a provision to protect the mother's health so it got the veto. We aren't naive, if that were a provision we'd have a million reports coming out that pregnancy is dangerous, regardless of actual circumstances.
I love SD, we're always right, in more ways than one!
I think you may be talking about partial birth abortion...right?
"I love SD, we're always right, in more ways than one!"
I'll second that ;)