Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hurricane Emily (Live Thread, Part II)
NHC-NOAA ^ | 16 July 2005 | NHC

Posted on 07/16/2005 1:33:53 PM PDT by NautiNurse

Hurricanes Emily and Dennis are the strongest July storms in recorded history for the Atlantic hurricane basin...

Hurricane Emily resources--the links are self-updating for handy reference:

NHC Hurricane Public Advisory Updates Currently published every three hours 5A, 8A, 11A, 2P, 5P, etc. ET.

NHC Hurricane Discussion Updates Published every 6 hours 5A, 11A, 5P, 11P ET

Storm Floater IR Loop Little boxes at top of image: lat/lon, and Trop Fcst Pts--click 'em.

Caribbean IR Loop

Caribbean Visible Loop (Only works during daylight hours)

Storm Floater Sat Both loop and latest image

Western Caribbean Bouy Data

Jamaica Weather Has a few still radar images

Grand Cayman Weather

Cozumel Weather

Cancun Weather

Cancun Radar Very Slow Load

Another Cancun Radar another Very Slow Load

Hurricane Track Forecast

Hurricane Model Projections

Emily Forecast Track Archive Loop Great for reviewing the NHC 3 day and 5 day historic track positions



Some more resources:

Hurricane City

Global Satellite Imagery Amazing view of the world (Broadband)

Water Vapor SatelliteAnother colorful loop for broadband

Central Florida Hurricane Center offers a variety of info

Another colorful IR Satellite loop


The Saffir-Simpson Scale. Source: Hurricane Categories
Category Wind Speed Barometric
Pressure
Storm Surge Damage Potential
1
(weak)
75 - 95 mph
65 - 82 kts
33 - 42 m/s
> 28.94 in. Hg
> 980.0 mb
> 97.7 kPa
4.0 - 5.0 ft.
1.2 - 1.5 m
minimal damage to vegetation
2
(moderate)
96 - 110 mph
83 - 95 kts
43 - 49 m/s
28.50 - 28.93 in. Hg
965.1 - 979.7 mb
96.2 - 97.7 kPa
6.0 - 8.0 ft.
1.8 - 2.4 m
moderate damage to houses
3
(strong)
111 - 130 mph
96 - 113 kts
50 - 58 m/s
27.91 - 28.49 in. Hg
945.1 - 964.8 mb
96.2 - 97.7 kPa
9.0 - 12.0 ft.
2.7 - 3.7 m
extensive damage to small buildings
4
(very strong)
131 - 155 mph
114 - 135 kts
59 - 69 m/s
27.17 - 27.90 in. Hg
920.1 - 944.8 mb
91.7 - 94.2 kPa
13.0 - 18.0 ft.
3.9 - 5.5 m
extreme structural damage
5
(devastating)
> 155 mph
> 135 kts
> 70 m/s
< 27.17 in Hg
< 920.1 mb
< 91.7 kPa
> 18.0 ft
> 5.5 m
catastrophic building failures possible


Hurricane Emily Live Thread, Part I


TOPICS: Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: emily; hurricane; hurricaneemily; tropical; weather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-595 next last
To: NautiNurse

Got it.


41 posted on 07/16/2005 2:24:50 PM PDT by Howlin (Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Hurricane Emily Discussion Number 24

Statement as of 5:00 PM EDT on July 16, 2005

 
Emily has continued to strengthen this afternoon.  At about 17z...an
Air Force Reserve hurricane hunter aircraft indicates that the
central pressure has fallen to 937 mb...with 700 mb flight-level
winds as high as 151 kt in the northeastern quadrant.  This supports
the initial intensity of 135 kt.  There is a possibility that Emily
has gotten stronger since the aircraft left the storm.  However...
the satellite signature does not yet support stronger winds...so
any further increase in the intital winds will wait for the next
aircraft scheduled near 00z.

 
The initial motion remains 290/16.  Other than that...there is no
change in the forecast philosophy.  Emily is south and southwest of
a deep layer ridge extending from the Atlantic across Florida into
the northern Gulf of Mexico.  Large-scale models agree this ridge
should build slowly westward...with perhaps a weakness remaining
over eastern Texas as a shortwave trough moves through the north
central U.S.  Emily should continue west-northwestward for 36-48
hr...which should take the center near or over the Yucatan
Peninsula of Mexico.  After that...the exact track depends on how
much weakness there is in the ridge over Texas. Model guidance has
not changed much since the last set of runs...except for the
UKMET...which is shifted to the north and is now the right outlier. 
The official forecast is between the UKMET and the NOGAPS in best
agreement with GUNS...and lies close to the right edge of the
envelope of guidance.  The new track is an update of the previous
track through 36 hr...then shifted a little southward thereafter.

The intensity forecast is somewhat problematic.  The SHIPS model has
20 kt of shear affecting Emily from which it forecasts weakening...
but this shear is not apparent in satellite imagery or satellite-
derived winds from CIMSS.  A recent trmm overpass showed no
evidence of an outer eyewall...although there was some outer
banding that could soon wrap up into an outer eyewall. 
Complicating matters further...the SHIPS model shows a maximum
potential intensity of 155-160 kt...while maximum potential
intensities from cola are closer to 135 kt.  The intensity forecast
follows the scenario that the maximum winds will oscillate around
135 kt as the hurricane GOES through internal cycles.  However...it
would not be a surprise if Emily became a category five hurricane
for some part of the next 24 hr.  Emily should weaken over
Yucatan...but still be a major hurricane over the western Gulf of
Mexico.

12 ft seas radii were greatly revised in the southeastern quadrant
based on observations from NOAA buoy 42058.  The initial wind radii
were somewhat revised based on aircraft data. 

 
Forecaster Beven

 

 
forecast positions and Max winds

 
initial      16/2100z 16.8n  78.8w   135 kt
 12hr VT     17/0600z 17.7n  81.2w   135 kt
 24hr VT     17/1800z 19.1n  84.4w   135 kt
 36hr VT     18/0600z 20.4n  87.7w   125 kt...inland
 48hr VT     18/1800z 21.6n  90.7w   100 kt...over water
 72hr VT     19/1800z 23.5n  96.0w   105 kt
 96hr VT     20/1800z 25.0n 100.5w    65 kt...inland
120hr VT     21/1800z 26.0n 104.5w    20 kt...inland dissipating

42 posted on 07/16/2005 2:25:00 PM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nwctwx; Dog Gone
in an invisible piece of air

That's part of our intense border security measures and it will keep the storm south of the river, just like it stops the illegals.

43 posted on 07/16/2005 2:26:53 PM PDT by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nwctwx
Well, hell. I've been busy doing other stuff today and I didn't realize we were counting on a ridge building in order to shield us.

That's quite different. My comfort level just went way down.

44 posted on 07/16/2005 2:28:17 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Most of the hurricane models are showing that, hence the left hand hook near the end of their tracks. But, this thing has been bouncing in and out of the GMO rather erratically lately, and even when it does build in you have the shortwave trough coming through the mid-section of the country Mon/Tue.
45 posted on 07/16/2005 2:34:44 PM PDT by nwctwx (Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

They are forecasting Miss Emily to emerge from the Yucatan a Cat 3.


46 posted on 07/16/2005 2:37:54 PM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Oh, wonderful. It emerges as a major hurricane. I hope I bookmarked that site where you buy the plywood clips. Heck, I'd better just go to Home Depot down the street and see if they have them.


47 posted on 07/16/2005 2:41:09 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse; Dog Gone

I was hoping the 18z GFS might give some new clues, I guess not. ;-)

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/18/images/gfs_ten_030l.gif


48 posted on 07/16/2005 2:44:58 PM PDT by nwctwx (Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Go now. By the time you realize you need them, they'll be out of stock along with plywood, batteries, generators, etc.


49 posted on 07/16/2005 2:45:23 PM PDT by Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Ping to self.


50 posted on 07/16/2005 2:47:04 PM PDT by Clara Lou (In this order: Read. Post comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: nwctwx

18z NOGAPS is further north, first hit very close to Cancun... comes in right around TX/MX border.


51 posted on 07/16/2005 2:48:29 PM PDT by nwctwx (Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I hope this isn't Gilbert pt II.

Gilbert photos Two amazing pics.

52 posted on 07/16/2005 2:52:30 PM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
PlyLox clips
53 posted on 07/16/2005 2:54:07 PM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: nwctwx

Actually, a bit south of the border... a good 100 mile shift from the last run though.


54 posted on 07/16/2005 2:54:08 PM PDT by nwctwx (Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nwctwx

definitely looks strong....got some more blow-up on the south end.

Following NHC track pretty darn well now.

Hopefully that will continue so it will miss Texas. Pray for a strong high.


55 posted on 07/16/2005 2:54:33 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Ping to self.

Don't want to talk to us, eh? ;o)

56 posted on 07/16/2005 2:55:25 PM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nwctwx

lol...yeah, that isn't going to help any since that is much too far south.


57 posted on 07/16/2005 2:56:00 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I'm busy praying for that ridge to appear. God has my undivided attention.


58 posted on 07/16/2005 2:57:29 PM PDT by Clara Lou (In this order: Read. Post comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
EMILY PREDICTION FROM THE U.S. NAVY

USN

59 posted on 07/16/2005 2:58:15 PM PDT by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: All

I'm really curious about my previous question:

Emily is a small but powerful hurricane right now. Since she won't encounter any resistance and will be above very hot waters, is there a possibility or a probability that she will grow larger in size? What factors would be necessary for that to happen? A slower forward motion?

Anybody know?


60 posted on 07/16/2005 2:59:55 PM PDT by Miztiki (Pearland, TX (just southeast of Houston))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-595 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson