Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHINESE GENERAL WARNS U.S.
CNEWS ^ | 15 July 2005 | Joe McDonald

Posted on 07/15/2005 1:28:05 PM PDT by Robert Drobot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Swiss

I agree with you in part, but what makes you feel that China could not respond? Just curious. I thought they had a pretty beefy nuclear arsenal themselves.


21 posted on 07/15/2005 6:19:53 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
There are several threads on this already. It is about as popular as the Alqaida nukes threads.

As far as Clintons go, as my eyes melt in the eyesockets from the detonating nuke I am sure my last thought would be of those Clintons. Right.

22 posted on 07/15/2005 6:22:10 PM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swiss
We should have went to full alert, put carriers off their coasts, sent nukes to Japan and Taiwan, and then said the UniCal deal is nixed.

They are probing us for reaction, and I'm afraid we failed. Now they no we won't do anything.

23 posted on 07/15/2005 6:29:01 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Time factor, sub launched missiles would take out the command stucture in a matter of minutes. Peking would be glowing before they could be alerted.

Surviving military would not know who hit them (could of been the Russians for all they know) and with the EMP pluse distroying communications plus the fallout and destruction they are going to be busy with their own problems.

In a communist country like China who has been conditioned to take orders from above if you take out the leadership the followers is most likely to surrender than fight.


24 posted on 07/15/2005 7:44:09 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

China's answer to the Global Warming problem: China's dust in the ash can of history.


25 posted on 07/15/2005 9:50:50 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
Unrestricted Warfare, by Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui (Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House, February 1999)
26 posted on 07/15/2005 9:55:57 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
A Chinese general said Beijing might respond with nuclear weapons if the United States attacked China in a conflict over Taiwan, news reports said Friday.

That would be very stupid of him.

27 posted on 07/15/2005 9:59:37 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoggyBottomBoy
We really needed General Douglas MacArthur then - as president - and we need a General Douglas MacArthur now!!!

Bush doesn't have the guts to do the right thing, just as his all-Bush-no-balls brother didn't have the guts to do the right thing to stop the judicial torture and murder of Terri Schindler-Schiavo. Seems the brothers only have the courage to do females with a disadvantage. Politically it doesn't get any worse than the backstabbing their both doing on Kathleen Harris who saved them from oblivion. But keeping your word stops at the Texas border for the Bush boys.

28 posted on 07/16/2005 4:26:05 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All

China, Hughes Electronics Corp., Boeing Satellite Systems, and Loral Space and Communications Ltd........bump!


29 posted on 07/16/2005 11:16:01 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Supposedly we get to choose our leaders. If you know of another Teddy Roosevelt, point him out and we'll get to work.


30 posted on 07/16/2005 11:19:21 AM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Swiss

You're forgetting one thing --

mobile sub launchers. If it's nuked, it'll automatically react by attacking the default target, whatever it may be.

Besides, all of the fallout from the nukes detonated in China will come back to the US in a couple of days (wind only goes Eastward....)


31 posted on 07/17/2005 9:33:11 AM PDT by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

The Chinese know the truth. This is their way of flexing some muscle.

We'd spank them. A Taiwan war would be naval and air intense. We would embarrass them. It would be a one sided slaughter. A “Turkey Shoot” of unequivocal size.

Red6


32 posted on 07/24/2005 8:21:09 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6
It wouldn't have to be a consideration if Hughes Electronics Corp., Boeing Satellite Systems, and Loral Space and Communications Ltd. had not been so treasonous.

The welfare of our nation is questionable thanks to their giving/selling Lucifer's atheist demons the trajectory technology they lacked previously.

33 posted on 07/24/2005 9:29:42 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Red6
.....and this all happened while that rapist degenerate was in the Oval Office.
34 posted on 07/24/2005 9:31:09 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
I'm glad this communist opened his pie hole.

I want a satillite weapon that will detect and detonate an ICBM at 2500 feet above the launch site. You shoot, you're dead. So, shoot all you want.

We can do that, we're Americans we can do anything.

35 posted on 07/24/2005 9:35:50 AM PDT by timydnuc (I'll die on my feet before I'll live on my knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson