Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1

"In addition to focusing new attention on Mr. Rove and whether he can survive the political fallout, the revelation is sure to create new partisan pressure on Mr. Bush."

I see the language about the Supreme Court pick. But I'm stunned the NYT can spin this like it puts more pressure on Rove rather than vice versa. Pravda.

I expect we'll see all sorts of people were talking about Mrs. Wilson.

Also, I think these are leaks from the Rove camp that the desperate NYT tried to spin as harmful to Rove. I don't recall a NYT article that so strived to tell the readers how to think about the information reported.


70 posted on 07/14/2005 8:53:41 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Shermy
I don't recall a NYT article that so strived to tell the readers how to think about the information reported.

Ultimate desperation. There is a plaintive "Pleeeeeaaaaase? Just this once?" between the lines.

76 posted on 07/14/2005 8:56:13 PM PDT by JennysCool (Be good, and you will be lonesome. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Shermy
That's the new Dim strategy here - use Novak and Rove to play up the "unholy alliance" betwewen the White House and the "noise machine of the extreme right." Lock up your sons - the VRWC is officially in control of the Executive Branch!!!

They'll probably start dredging up Armstrong Williams and Jeff Gannon again, to demonstrate the "pattern."

87 posted on 07/14/2005 8:58:53 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson