Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: musanon
The definitive question, imo..

Do you agree that the 2nd Amendment is a Law of the Land, - and therefore must be supported, as written, by all judges & officials, -- notwithstanding any State laws to the contrary?

Another way of putting it:

"Mr. Protojustice, do you know the difference between a dependent clause and the subject of a sentence?"

"Of course, Senator."

"Then, would you please diagram the following and explain its meaning: 'A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.' ?"

22 posted on 07/15/2005 8:33:20 PM PDT by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird
The definitive question, imo..
Do you agree that the 2nd Amendment is a Law of the Land, - and therefore must be supported, as written, by all judges & officials, -- notwithstanding any State laws to the contrary?

Another way of putting it:
"Mr. Protojustice, do you know the difference between a dependent clause and the subject of a sentence?"

"Of course, Senator."

"Then, would you please diagram the following and explain its meaning: 'A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.' ?"

"Certainly Senator. It means that the individual right can be severely regulated, & certain types of arms prohibited.
-- I cite as proof the recent Justice Dept report prepared by the current administration."

23 posted on 07/15/2005 9:10:56 PM PDT by musanon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson