Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706

I don't want to reject this out out hand but this isn't the first time a research university has said they appeared to have some support for cold fusion. Georgia Tech got horribly embarrassed when they made a similar announcement and then peer review revealed they had forgotten to subtract a key component of background radiation.

It would be nice if it were true though.


6 posted on 07/14/2005 10:21:56 AM PDT by grondram (The problem with the middle of the road is that you're passed on all sides and likely to be runover.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: grondram

This is bigger news, if true, because this is the first time the results have been reproduced.


8 posted on 07/14/2005 10:25:20 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: grondram
I don't want to reject this out out hand but this isn't the first time a research university has said they appeared to have some support for cold fusion. Georgia Tech got horribly embarrassed when they made a similar announcement and then peer review revealed they had forgotten to subtract a key component of background radiation.

The control beaker pretty much takes care of that problem. The acetone without deuterium showed no signs of fusion. The acetone with deuterium did. To the extent you can tell from popular press, this looks like a well designed experiment that produced strong results.

14 posted on 07/14/2005 10:33:21 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson