Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Saberwielder

I understand.
But Mushareff seems to be hanging on by mere threads. He apparently cannot count on his own military which has a large jihadi element itself.
I would imagine that our offices in Pakistan are little more than information gathering posts only. There is little they can actually do.
It would be nice if we could attack those schools and "camps" but I just do not see a practical way to do so without losing Mushareff completely and the little that he does.
Perhaps we should not worry about it and do it anyway. We could stand the international "heat" with a hearty "stfu".
But i would think the "camps" would simply reappear somewhere else.
I just don't know. It is frustrating as hel l.


11 posted on 07/14/2005 7:56:47 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Adder
Let's assume you are correct. If Musharraf's fall is impending, then wtf are doing not taking over his nukes - yet?

Having lived in Pakistan and worked on strategic affairs of the Near East for almost 3 decades, I can tell you that Musharraf's hold on power is stronger than what is being conveyed.

Many of these camps were reopened earlier this year with Pakistan army permission as per a report in a prominent Pakistani magazine.

13 posted on 07/14/2005 8:01:39 AM PDT by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson