Replies

Read this amicus brief from 36 news organizations (including the New York Times!) as to why no crime was committed by Rove. It refutes every one of Corn's claims.

36 posted on 07/13/2005 11:16:55 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")

To: FreedomCalls

On page 29 it states that the law was crafted very specifically NOT to prevent disclosure of impropriety in government.

Rove specifically spoke about this to dispute a story about Cheney sending Wilson by offering that it was Wilson's wife who sent him.

That's very conveniently overlooked by the left--just as they keep wailing that "we went into Iraq over WMD," they keep ignoring that Wilson was credible to them because "he was hand-picked by Dick Cheney to look into this". Now that that's "inoperative" the libs dismiss it. It was the foot in the door they needed to bring up this topic.

I'm just astonished at the left's sudden concern for leaks. Since freakin when????

49 posted on 07/13/2005 11:43:33 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 ("Familiarity doesn't breed contempt, it IS contempt."--Florence King)

To: FreedomCalls

Real quick, what is the purpose of an amicus brief? and, what does amici curiae and en banc mean? (damn lawyerspeak)

56 posted on 07/14/2005 12:15:32 AM PDT by cport (How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794