[Dr.Hilarious]

Demolished? And now you claim that the Senate Intel Report is 'supposition'?

No, never did. When did I say that? You suddenly brought that up as a diversion--unless you're saying the Senate Intel Report supports your assertions about Rove, which it does not, it merely contains the information about the Plame case. It says not one word about Rove doing the things you claim he did.

Off your rocker, with an overinflated opinion of your destructive capacity.

Please see post 35. Funny how you stopped replying to me point by point all of a sudden.

[lugsoul]

Your supposed 'point-by-point' has nothing to do with any substantive information, with the exception of the one issue I responded on. The rest of it is just bizarre rambling about you wanting me to provide info no one knows and questioning my motives.

I'm glad you have such a high opinion of your posts, but I'm still standing, without a scratch.