Posted on 07/12/2005 9:31:17 PM PDT by oc311
No--once again you cherrypick and simply ignore all those many points I made and pretend I didn't go through your last post point by point and answer them. You skip all that. And you're still skipping it.
Uh, you mean THIS senate intelligence committee report?
http://intelligence.senate.gov/iraqreport2.pdf
No, never did. When did I say that? You suddenly brought that up as a diversion--unless you're saying the Senate Intel Report supports your assertions about Rove, which it does not, it merely contains the information about the Plame case. It says not one word about Rove doing the things you claim he did.
Off your rocker, with an overinflated opinion of your destructive capacity.
Please see post 35. Funny how you stopped replying to me point by point all of a sudden.
I'm glad you have such a high opinion of your posts, but I'm still standing, without a scratch.
As for substantive information, you have none. If you consider asking you to keep the discussion on what is known as opposed to your fantasies about Rove "bizarre rambling" then it's quite obvious who's still standing, and who's jsut making things up.
Since you haven't responded to the "bizarre rambling" of three posts--if it's so bizarre, why can't you refute the points, including the link to the senate report...which is so classified that it was linked in online articles four days after it appeared?--then obviously you realize you have no argument, are simply making it all up, and you know it.
By your own admission you have no facts; your behavior shows all you've got is grudge against Rove. All that proves is you have an ax to grind, and that's fine. The rest of us will rely on reality. Enjoy being the master of your own warped view of reality.
I think you are either off your rocker or intentionally attempting to create misdirection. So, tell you what. Any so-called 'point' you want me to respond to - put it out there. Don't simply refer to your earlier ramblings. You got a point you want a response to - ask it. I'll respond directly. Have at it.
This is the best info yet!
Bump.
Gore v/s Bush. The little c***s***er spread all manner of untruths about W.
The comment Rove supposedly made that Wilson's wife was "fair game" is what Wilson said Chris Matthews said Rove told Matthews.
There are two degrees of grandstanding interpretation in that report. First of all, we don't know that Matthews accurately relayed the comment to Wilson (and it seems highly unlikely to me that Rove would have used such inflammatory language in a conversation with Matthews). Secondly, anything Wilson reports is always done in a drama-queen style, as can be seen from his media appearances and reading excerpts from his book.
So, I would take the "fair game" comment with a very large grain of salt.
The DUI incident was one in which Chris Lehane was involved. Those records were sealed. Someone mamnaged to get them out of the courthouse. Chris Lehane, coincidentally, is from Maine, and his sister worked at the courthouse. The guy who shopped them to the press was a stooge, IMHO.
And there you go. Thanks Miss M!
Thanks Miss Marple. I could not put my finger on the specific incident.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.